Owners tend to read the headline in a letter of intent as the deal. In this Forbes piece I argue that it is closer to the opening of the real negotiation, and I describe a simple five-column table an owner can build in advance to see each price reduction coming and decide how to meet it.
Summary
The core argument: the gap between the number in the letter and the money at closing is where preparation pays off or does not. In one case I describe, a letter that implied about 7.2x EBITDA settled closer to 6.5x by the time the money moved. Nothing went wrong. That is how the process runs when the seller has not mapped it in advance.
The pattern is common enough to measure. In the Working Paper 001 dataset, 73% of lower-middle-market transactions included at least one price adjustment after the letter of intent, averaging 18% of enterprise value.1 An owner who has built the table sees those adjustments coming. An owner who has not meets them one at a time, late, with little room to answer.
The method
Build it before the letter of intent conversation. Each row is one issue a buyer's review is likely to raise.
Every row decided in advance is one less concession made in the room, under a deadline, to a buyer who already has exclusivity.Ron Smith, CM&AA, Founding Partner
Treat the letter of intent as a midpoint. Most of the distance between that number and the close comes from items the seller could have found, priced and answered before a buyer did. The table turns those items from surprises into decisions.
The later research builds on this idea. Working Paper 004 adds the next step: once the table shows where value is exposed, rank the fixes by the value each protects for the effort it takes, and leave the rest alone.
Related
Sources
Cite this
Smith, R. (2026, June 26). Why Founders Should Build A Gap Table Before The Letter Of Intent Arrives. Forbes Business Council.
Cordis works with owners preparing to sell and with owners growing through acquisition.
A written read of how a buyer will see your company.